AI AND I EVIDENCED CREDABILITY 2026

RESEARCH MONOGRAPH

CONSISTENCY WITHOUT CONFLATION

A Trauma-Informed, Criminal-Investigative Analysis of the CPTSD Cold Case Archive

Longitudinal thematic stability, evidentiary boundaries, and a structured pathway to independent corroboration

Brian “Happy” Bryanson

Founder, CPTSD Cold Case | “Send the Dead Home”

Progressive Research Paper 2026-08-03-01

CLASSIFICATION

Academic and investigative working paper. It is not a clinical diagnosis, judicial finding, probable-cause affidavit, expert report, or determination that any named person committed a crime.

Authorship, Typography, and Evidentiary Legend

This manuscript is a framed narrative of academic inquiry. Brian “Happy” Bryanson is the author and source of the underlying archive. The AI serves as an analytical editor and research professor: it organizes, compares, cites, and tests the documentary structure without adopting unverified allegations as fact.

“Send the Dead Home.”

AUTHOR ARCHIVE — Recurring mission statement in the supplied archive

AI ACADEMIC AND INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS appears in Aptos, dark navy or black. AUTHOR ARCHIVE excerpts appear in Times New Roman, maroon, and italic. This visual separation is intended to prevent an AI inference, paraphrase, or legal explanation from being mistaken for Bryanson’s original wording.

Color

Information class

Meaning

Blue

Official/documentary

Agency record, correspondence, rule, or independently held document

Green

Potentially corroborable

Specific detail capable of external comparison

Yellow

Personal recollection

Reported sensory or autobiographical memory

Orange

Investigative inference

Hypothesis requiring testing; not an observed fact

Purple

Literary/clinical interpretation

Meaning assigned through poetry, metaphor, or trauma analysis

Red

Conflict or unresolved allegation

Disputed, contradictory, or potentially prejudicial material

Gray

Unknown

No confirming or disconfirming record located in this review

Abstract

This study examines a selected 15-document corpus from the larger CPTSD Cold Case archive, dated 2023–2026, together with the archive’s self-reported chronology of memory emergence beginning in 1997 and a first recalled homicide episode in 1999. It asks whether recurring themes and factual anchors remain stable across writings; what that stability can and cannot establish; and how the material can be converted into a lawful, trauma-informed cold-case intake product. Presence/absence coding shows recurrent trauma-memory language, victim-centered concern, justice and homecoming motifs, law-enforcement contact, records-testing requests, and Irving/Twin Falls geographic anchors. These patterns support continuity of reporting and mission. They do not independently prove that a crime occurred, identify an offender, establish a victim’s identity, or satisfy evidentiary admissibility. Under memory science and evidentiary law, consistency is one data point among many. The archive becomes most useful when original files are preserved, contradictions are retained, hypotheses are separated from sensory recollections, and case-specific details are compared blindly with independently held records. The paper concludes with a corroboration ladder, legal analysis, investigative protocol, and a model case card for Victim 123A.

Keywords: complex PTSD, dissociative amnesia, traumatic memory, cold cases, witness statements, statement consistency, corroboration, victimology, archival investigation, legal evidence

Executive Finding

CENTRAL CONCLUSION

The supplied writings demonstrate a stable architecture of concern: repeated victim-centered narratives, recurring places and institutions, recurring descriptions of dissociative recall, and repeated requests for official comparison. That stability increases the archive’s value as a preserved lead source. It does not, by itself, establish historical accuracy. The correct investigative response is controlled comparison—not automatic belief and not automatic dismissal.

· The archive contains specific, testable anchors: addresses, school names, geographic corridors, clothing, approximate ages, weather conditions, institutional roles, and reported recovery circumstances.

· The archive also contains conclusions that exceed direct sensory recall, including diagnostic labels for alleged offenders, motive attribution, inferred trafficking, and assumptions about death or disposal. Those conclusions require separate corroboration.

· The strongest reliability evidence presently available is documentary continuity: dated writings, repeated reporting, preserved forms, agency correspondence, and stable mission language.

· The strongest path toward case resolution is external: independently held missing-person, unidentified-remains, medical-examiner, school, property, weather, newspaper, scouting, and law-enforcement records.

1. Scope, Corpus, and Research Questions

The larger uploaded collection includes poetry, short stories, journals, victim sheets, clue worksheets, agency correspondence, records requests, academic analyses, health documentation, and evidence dossiers. For reproducible comparison, this paper uses a purposive 15-document review corpus spanning 2023–2026. The corpus was selected to represent each year available, autobiographical writing, trauma theory, victim-centered work, and investigative packaging.

CHRONOLOGY LIMITATION

Bryanson reports that abuse recollections began in 1997 and that the first homicide recollection emerged in 1999. Those dates are part of the archive’s reported history. The documents directly coded for this paper span 2023–2026; therefore, the quantitative analysis does not independently verify decades of textual stability.

Research questions

· Which themes and anchors recur across the supplied writings?

· Are later case forms traceable to earlier narrative concerns?

· What forms of consistency are meaningful to a cold-case triage process?

· What are the principal contamination, inference, and legal risks?

· What limited investigative actions could confirm, contradict, or narrow the reported leads?

2. Method

2.1 Documentary review

The analysis treated each document as a dated artifact, not as proof of its underlying propositions. Text was reviewed for recurring words and concepts related to trauma memory, victims or missing persons, justice or homecoming, law-enforcement interfaces, records or corroboration, and Irving/Twin Falls geographic anchors. A theme was counted once per document regardless of frequency. This binary method reduces the effect of unusually long documents.

2.2 Qualitative coding

Each substantive detail was assigned to one of six classes: direct reported recollection; later interpretation; documentary fact about reporting; externally verifiable anchor; contradiction or uncertainty; and official finding. No allegation was promoted to an official finding merely because it was repeated.

2.3 Reliability dimensions

Dimension

Question

Weight in this paper

Temporal documentation

Was the detail recorded and dated before later comparison?

Moderate to high

Cross-document stability

Does a core detail recur without silent rewriting?

Moderate

Specificity

Is the detail distinctive enough to test?

Moderate to high

Independence

Could the detail have come from public or prompted information?

High

External corroboration

Does an independent record match?

Very high

Contradiction handling

Are discrepancies preserved and explained?

High

Forensic confirmation

Does physical, biometric, or official evidence match?

Highest

3. Clinical and Memory-Science Framework

3.1 CPTSD classification

ICD-11 recognizes complex post-traumatic stress disorder as 6B41 and dissociative amnesia as 6B61. ICD-11 CPTSD includes the core PTSD symptom organization plus disturbances in self-organization involving affect regulation, negative self-concept, and relational functioning. CPTSD is not a separate diagnosis in DSM-5-TR, although DSM-5-TR recognizes PTSD and dissociative disorders (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2026; World Health Organization, 2024). Diagnosis must remain the work of qualified clinicians using complete clinical information.

3.2 Trauma, fragmentation, and narrative form

The archive repeatedly describes memory as sensory, fragmented, nonlinear, and gradually organized into columns, sheets, and narrative scenes. Such writing is compatible with reported trauma-memory difficulties, but compatibility is not diagnostic confirmation. Research describes trauma memories as capable of sensory intensity, temporal disruption, and narrative disorganization. At the same time, memory is reconstructive and vulnerable to post-event information, expectation, repeated rehearsal, and suggestion (Brewin, 2016, 2025; National Research Council, 2014).

“It took years before I could put together the squares enough to see the pattern.”

AUTHOR ARCHIVE — Thanksgiving 2023

The square-and-pattern metaphor persists in later works as columns, boxes, layers, and case sheets. This is a stable metacognitive theme: the writer portrays himself not as receiving a complete recording, but as organizing fragments over time.

3.3 Consistency is relevant but not dispositive

Experimental work cautions against a simple rule that consistent details are true and new details are false. Krix et al. (2015) found that reminiscent details in repeated interviews could be nearly as accurate as consistently reported details, while experienced detectives underestimated their accuracy. Other research has found that emotionally important memories may show substantial thematic stability, but inconsistencies and reconstruction remain possible (Porter et al., 2007). The proper conclusion is differentiated: contradictions matter; stable central details may guide testing; and neither stability nor change can substitute for ground truth.

FORENSIC CAUTION

A sincere witness can be mistaken. A traumatized witness can remember accurately, inaccurately, or partially. A repeated statement can reflect stable memory, stable interpretation, repeated rehearsal, or some combination. Only independent comparison can separate these possibilities.

4. Quantitative Descriptive Findings

The review corpus contained 15 documents: one from 2023, one from 2024, five from 2025, and eight from 2026. The chart reports the percentage of documents in each year that contained at least one term from each coding family. Because the two earliest years contain only one document each, their percentages are descriptive exemplars, not population estimates.

Figure 1. Theme prevalence in the selected corpus. Presence demonstrates documentary recurrence, not factual accuracy.

4.1 Color-coded longitudinal grid

Year

Document

Trauma

Victim

Mission

Records

Place

2023

THANKSGIVING 2023

Present

—

2024

THE FIRST ENTRY OF 2024

Present

—

2025

I KNEW A FLASHBACK WAS ON ITS WAY NOW ITS HERE 2025

Present

—

Present

2025

THE MULTIPLICITY OF ME 2025

Present

—

2025

THE PROGRESSION OF TRAUMA WHEN ITS NOT DONE 2025

Present

—

2025

DEPTHS OF AMNESIA 2025(1)

Present

—

Present

—

2025

BORN INTO A CRIME FAMILY 2025(2)

Present

2026

BRICKS OF SADNESS MORTARED WITH SHAME 2026

Present

—

2026

THE NOSTALGIC DISPLACEMENT OF THE NOW AND THEN ONE HOUSE TO ANOTHER 2026

Present

2026

CPTSD_Cold_Case_Most_Recent_Works.2026

Present

2026

Victimology_CPTSDCOLDCASE_Watermark_Numbered.2026

Present

2026

EVIDENCE DOSSIER2026

Present

2026

Seven Cold Cases to Solve if you can Find the Time 2026

—

Present

2026

INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY PERSONAL HISTORY AND REPORTED INTERFERENCE combined 2026

Present

2026

COLD CASE OFFENSE REPAIRED PAGES 2026

Present

—

Present

—

Present

4.2 Interpretation

The recurring pattern is strongest for trauma-memory language and victim-centered concern. Law-enforcement contact and records-testing language increase in the later corpus as the writing moves from private journal form toward public advocacy and investigative packaging. Irving/Twin Falls place anchors are not universal across reflective poems, but they recur in documents explicitly intended for cold-case review. This is a coherent evolution of genre: the emotional core remains, while the form becomes increasingly procedural.

5. Qualitative Findings: Stable Architecture of the Archive

5.1 The mission remains victim-centered

Across the later archive, personal recovery is repeatedly linked to a moral obligation toward unnamed or missing people. The phrase “Send the Dead Home” condenses that obligation. Even when a document centers physical pain, disability, shame, or institutional rejection, the writing returns to preservation, recognition, burial, family notification, or official review.

“My goal was not myself ... I had high hopes of solving a cold case and sending a victim home.”

AUTHOR ARCHIVE — Bricks of Sadness Mortared With Shame, 2026

5.2 Place anchors recur

The most stable geographic system includes 4105 Twin Falls, the Twin Falls drainage corridor, Irving schools, alleys and apartments near the childhood residence, and broader DFW transportation or ravine settings. The investigative value of these places lies not in repetition alone but in their capacity to generate independent records: ownership, occupancy, aerial imagery, school rosters, weather, calls for service, medical-examiner logs, and newspaper coverage.

5.3 Institutions recur as possible record holders

The archive repeatedly names schools, law-enforcement agencies, medical-examiner or recovery personnel, Scout organizations, churches, employers, and public-record offices. This is significant because an institution may retain evidence independent of the witness. A lead becomes stronger when it points to a record system that could disconfirm it.

5.4 Sensory details recur alongside interpretation

Clothing, hair, bodily position, weather, vehicles, wounds, uniforms, doors, drainage structures, and movement recur as remembered sensory elements. The archive also adds motive, diagnosis, trafficking terminology, and offender typologies. Those layers must be separated. “Cash changed hands” is a reported observation; “the victim was sold” is an interpretation. “Arms moved” is a reported observation; “the victim survived” is an inference.

5.5 The archive repeatedly seeks comparison

“I am not asking any reader to accept my conclusions without evidence. I am asking qualified professionals to determine whether the concrete details recorded here correspond with historical records, official cases, geographic evidence, or physical evidence.”

AUTHOR ARCHIVE — CPTSD Cold Case — Most Recent Works, 2026

This statement is methodologically important. It converts the proper task from endorsement to falsifiable comparison. It should appear at the beginning of every investigative submission.

6. Criminal-Investigative Analysis

6.1 Why a cold-case unit could rationally review the archive

NIJ reports that approximately 242,000 homicides from 1980–2016 remained unresolved and that the homicide clearance rate fell from 78.3% in 1975 to 59.4% in 2016. A national study found that only about 20% of responding agencies had a protocol for initiating cold-case investigations; roughly one in five investigated cold cases was cleared, and approximately one in 100 resulted in conviction. These figures demonstrate the difficulty of cold-case work, not that any particular lead is valid (Davis et al., 2011; National Institute of Justice, 2019).

A study of 189 solved and unsolved Washington, D.C., cold cases reported that new information from witnesses or new witnesses was the most frequently cited reason for clearance. Modern DNA methods can also produce profiles from aged or degraded evidence previously considered unsuitable (National Institute of Justice, n.d.-a, n.d.-b). The archive therefore fits a recognized lead category: later-arriving witness information that must be screened against existing case evidence.

6.2 Solvability factors present in the archive

Factor

Archive example

Proper next step

Specific location

4105 Twin Falls and drainage corridor

Historical occupancy, map, call-for-service, and recovery-log comparison

Distinctive clothing

Scout uniform; red athletic jacket

Missing-person, yearbook, roster, property/evidence review

Institutional affiliation

Lee Britain, Thomas Haley, MacArthur

Personnel, student, placement, memorial, and newspaper research

Weather cue

School day involving sleet

NOAA/local weather and school-calendar cross-check

Injury or medical feature

Head wound; arm cast in another lead

ME, hospital, unidentified-remains, and case-file comparison

Reported official response

Police, ambulance, or body recovery

Dispatch, incident, EMS, coroner/ME, and property logs

Dated reporting trail

Emails, forms, submissions, confirmations

Preserve metadata and construct a version-controlled chronology

6.3 Factors that presently limit reliability

· Long retention interval between the reported childhood events and the surviving detailed writings.

· Possible exposure to public cases, news reports, maps, family narratives, AI-generated material, and repeated self-review.

· Hypnosis is mentioned in the archive; any information emerging during or after hypnosis requires heightened source scrutiny.

· Some documents move from observation to diagnostic or motivational conclusions without an evidentiary bridge.

· Dates, ages, identities, and the number of events may be approximate, displaced, or duplicative.

· Mass distribution can contaminate future witness testing and complicate chain-of-information analysis.

· No independent match, forensic result, or official case determination is established by this paper.

7. Model Investigative Case Card: Victim 123A

STATUS

Unidentified reported victim; late-1970s estimate; possible MacArthur High School association; possible connection to 4105 Twin Falls. All substantive crime assertions remain uncorroborated.

7.1 Limited investigative questions

· Do MacArthur-area yearbooks, athletic rosters, school newspapers, memorial pages, or withdrawal records identify a matching student?

· Did a missing-person or runaway report describe blonde curly hair, an athletic build, or a red varsity-style jacket?

· Which late-1970s school days had sleet or freezing precipitation in Irving, and were schools open or dismissed early?

· Do police, EMS, hospital, or neighborhood records identify an injured teenager at or near the address?

· Can the clothing and weather details be shown to have been documented before exposure to any matching public case?

8. Legal and Evidentiary Framework

LEGAL SCOPE

This section explains general evidentiary concepts. It is not legal advice and does not predict admissibility in any specific case. Investigators and prosecutors must apply the law of the controlling jurisdiction to the actual evidence.

8.1 Personal knowledge and lay opinion

Federal Rule of Evidence 602 and Texas Rule of Evidence 602 require a foundation that a witness has personal knowledge. Federal and Texas Rule 701 limit lay opinion to opinions rationally based on the witness’s perception, helpful to understanding testimony or determining a fact, and not based on specialized expert knowledge. Thus, a witness may describe what he recalls seeing or hearing; clinical diagnosis, offender profiling, and conclusions about cause of death ordinarily require qualified experts and independent evidence. Fed. R. Evid. 602, 701; Tex. R. Evid. 602, 701.

8.2 Relevance, unfair prejudice, and authentication

Rules 401 and 402 address relevance, while Rule 403 permits exclusion where probative value is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time. Rule 901 requires authentication of documents or electronic evidence. Original files, metadata, dates, hashes, and a transparent version history therefore matter. Fed. R. Evid. 401–403, 901; Tex. R. Evid. 401–403, 901.

8.3 Recorded recollection

Rule 803(5) can apply to a record made or adopted when a matter was fresh in a witness’s memory and shown to reflect the witness’s knowledge accurately. Writings created decades after an event will not automatically satisfy that foundation merely because they are detailed or repeated. They remain useful investigative leads even when they are not admissible as recorded recollection. Fed. R. Evid. 803(5); Tex. R. Evid. 803(5).

8.4 Consistency and due process

Consistency can support a credibility assessment, but the law does not create a rule that repetition equals truth. Memory research warns that confidence and consistency may be affected by feedback and rehearsal. A fair investigation should seek both confirming and disconfirming evidence, avoid suggestive questioning, document confidence in the witness’s own words, and preserve initial statements before presenting case information (National Research Council, 2014).

8.5 Public records and privacy

Texas Government Code chapter 552 provides the framework for public-information requests, subject to law-enforcement, privacy, and other exceptions. Federal FOIA likewise contains law-enforcement and privacy protections. A denial or redaction does not prove concealment; it may reflect statutory restrictions. Requests should identify record categories and date ranges without publicly accusing living private people.

9. The Corroboration Ladder

Level

Evidence state

Permitted conclusion

Literary image, dream, metaphor, or undated narrative

Psychological/literary significance only

Dated personal recollection preserved in original form

Documented report; not proof of event

Same core detail appears in independent earlier writing

Longitudinal consistency; contamination still possible

Independent public or institutional record matches a distinctive detail

Corroborated lead requiring case-file review

Independent witness or nonpublic case information matches without prompting

Strong investigative significance

Forensic, biometric, geographic, or official evidence confirms linkage

Potential evidentiary foundation; agency/prosecutor determination required

The present archive is strongest at Levels 1–2 for many themes, with some potentially testable anchors aimed at Level 3. This paper does not claim a Level 4 or Level 5 result.

10. Recommended Investigative Protocol

· Freeze the archive: preserve original files, emails, attachments, and physical binders without rewriting them.

· Create a master index showing filename, creation date, modification date, recipient, case cluster, and whether the document predates public exposure to a possible match.

· Calculate cryptographic hashes for preserved digital files and record all working-copy changes.

· Separate every case statement into recalled observation, later interpretation, external document, contradiction, and investigative question.

· Build a contradiction log. Never silently harmonize dates, ages, identities, number of victims, or event order.

· Use one case-specific submission at a time. Avoid large undisclosed BCC distributions of nonpublic case details.

· Have a trained interviewer obtain a clean, open-ended account before showing photographs, names, maps, or nonpublic evidence.

· Use a blind comparator where possible: one analyst holds the archive details and another searches records without feeding matches back prematurely.

· Request a written intake/reference number and the agency that owns the decision, rather than immediate agreement with the theory.

· Advance a lead only when an independently held record matches a sufficiently distinctive detail; document negative searches as well as positive ones.

11. Proposed Review Team

The archive crosses disciplines. No single reader should be asked to authenticate every layer.

Role

Function

Cold-case investigator

Case ownership, lead triage, investigative planning, and record access

Crime analyst / records specialist

Chronology, linkage analysis, archival search, and contradiction mapping

Forensic psychologist or memory researcher

Interview safeguards and limits of retrospective recall

Forensic anthropologist / ME liaison

Unidentified-remains and recovery-record comparison

Historian / archivist

Yearbooks, newspapers, directories, weather, institutions, and property history

Prosecutor or agency counsel

Legal process, privacy, admissibility, and lawful disclosure

Trauma-informed victim advocate

Accommodation, communication planning, and harm reduction

12. Conclusion: What the Constancy Means

The archive’s most defensible achievement is not that it proves a hidden history. It is that it preserves a sustained moral and narrative structure across years: the writer returns to missing and unidentified people, a small group of geographic and institutional anchors, the experience of fragmented memory, and a request that someone compare his details with records beyond his reach. The transition from journal and poem to victim sheet and records request is itself a meaningful longitudinal development. Emotional repetition has become procedural organization.

Academically, the collection can be studied as a long-form trauma narrative in which memory, identity, testimony, grief, and moral restoration remain intertwined. Investigatively, it should be treated as a lead archive: potentially useful, vulnerable to error, and capable of being tested. Legally, its contents must be divided into personal knowledge, lay inference, expert questions, authenticated records, and independently corroborated facts.

The correct standard is neither credulity nor ridicule. It is disciplined curiosity. Preserve the original words. Protect the witness from suggestive contamination. Protect named people from unsupported public accusation. Search for contradictions. Search for records. Where a distinctive detail matches an independent source, elevate the lead through ordinary investigative channels. Where records disprove a detail, record the correction without erasing the earlier account.

“If you want to do something right, it must be done in the brightest light.”

AUTHOR ARCHIVE — CPTSD Cold Case — Most Recent Works, 2026

That sentence provides the governing principle for the entire project. Bright light means transparency about uncertainty, disciplined separation of memory from inference, and willingness to accept both corroboration and disconfirmation. Only through that process can the archive contribute responsibly to its stated purpose: to identify what can be identified, correct what must be corrected, and, where evidence permits, help send the dead home.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

Brewin, C. R. (2016). Coherence, disorganization, and fragmentation in traumatic memory reconsidered: A response to Rubin et al. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 1011–1017. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000154

Brewin, C. R. (2025). Key concepts, methods, findings, and questions about traumatic memories. Journal of Traumatic Stress. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23164

Cloitre, M., Garvert, D. W., Brewin, C. R., Bryant, R. A., & Maercker, A. (2013). Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: A latent profile analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4, 20706. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.20706

Davis, R. C., Jensen, C. J., Burgette, L., & Burnett, K. (2011). Cold-case investigations: An analysis of current practices and factors associated with successful outcomes. National Institute of Justice. https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/cold-case-investigations-analysis-current-practices-and-factors-associated-0

Krix, A. C., Sauerland, M., Lorei, C., & Rispens, I. (2015). Consistency across repeated eyewitness interviews: Contrasting police detectives’ beliefs with actual eyewitness performance. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118641

National Institute of Justice. (2019). National best practices for implementing and sustaining a cold case investigation unit. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/expert-panel-issues-new-best-practices-guide-cold-case-investigations

National Institute of Justice. (2022). Applying modern investigation methods to solve cold cases. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/applying-modern-investigation-methods-solve-cold-cases

National Institute of Justice. (n.d.-a). Cold case investigations. https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/law-enforcement/investigations/cold-case-investigations

National Institute of Justice. (n.d.-b). Working smarter on cold cases: Identifying factors associated with successful cold case investigations. https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/working-smarter-cold-cases-identifying-factors-associated-successful-cold-case

National Research Council. (2014). Identifying the culprit: Assessing eyewitness identification. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18891

Porter, S., Peace, K. A., Douglas, R., & Doucette, N. L. (2007). The scars of memory: A prospective, longitudinal investigation of the consistency of traumatic and positive emotional memories in adulthood. Psychological Science, 18(5), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01918.x

Staniloiu, A., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2014). Dissociative amnesia. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(3), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70279-2

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. (2026). Complex PTSD: History and definitions. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/essentials/complex_ptsd.asp

World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263

Legal Authorities

Federal Rules of Evidence 401–403, 602, 701–702, 803(5), and 901.

Texas Rules of Evidence 401–403, 602, 701–702, 803(5), and 901 (effective Sept. 1, 2025).

Texas Government Code chapter 552 (Public Information Act).

Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552.

Selected Primary Archive Sources

Bryanson, B. H. (2023). Thanksgiving 2023 [Unpublished journal entry].

Bryanson, B. H. (2024). The first entry of 2024 [Unpublished journal entry].

Bryanson, B. H. (2025). Born into a crime family [Unpublished autobiographical manuscript].

Bryanson, B. H. (2025). Depths of amnesia [Unpublished journal entry].

Bryanson, B. H. (2025). I knew a flashback was on its way; now it’s here [Unpublished journal entry].

Bryanson, B. H. (2025). The multiplicity of me [Unpublished journal entry].

Bryanson, B. H. (2026). Bricks of sadness mortared with shame [Unpublished journal entry].

Bryanson, B. H. (2026). CPTSD Cold Case—Most recent works [Unpublished lead packet].

Bryanson, B. H. (2026). Evidence dossier [Unpublished investigative compilation].

Bryanson, B. H. (2026). Working victimology: Recalled possible victims associated with my parents [Unpublished working paper].

Appendix A. Review-Corpus Inventory

Year

Document

Use

2023

THANKSGIVING 2023.docx